Skip to main content

Do this first

Your safe boundary

You may record the pattern, check visible labels and use installed extraction through normal controls, but do not open fans, ducts, appliances or pipework.

Temporary cooking moisture may be expected, but repeated wet surfaces, mould, swollen units or spread into other rooms needs investigation.

No verified cost range is available for this page.

Safety warnings

What is known — and what is not

What is known

  • Only the page's recorded observations, documents and stated scope are treated as known.

What remains uncertain

  • Kitchen wetness cannot be assigned to cooking condensation until extraction type, plumbing, appliance water routes, cold surfaces and rain entry are considered. [1][2]

Possible explanations

  • cooking vapour condensing on cold surfaces [1][2]
  • a recirculating hood without separate external extract [1][2]
  • an ineffective or faulty kitchen extract system [1][2]
  • a plumbing, waste or water-using appliance leak [1][2]
  • external water ingress [1][2]

Separate vapour from a water leak

  • Droplets that appear on several cold surfaces during cooking may fit condensation, while still leaving the ventilation cause unresolved. [1]
  • A cooker hood may recirculate air rather than discharge it outdoors, so noise alone does not establish moisture extraction. [2]
  • Wetness centred below a sink, appliance, joint or service route and linked to water use may indicate a leak. [1]
  • A high-level mark that follows rain may indicate an external or roof water path rather than cooking vapour alone. [1]

Low-risk checks

  • Photograph the first wet surface and record cooking, sink, appliance and rain timing. [1]
  • Check labels and already-visible duct information without removing any component. [2]
  • Use an installed external extract or kitchen fan through its normal control and note sound, indicator and apparent failure. [2]
  • Photograph accessible drips or stain growth without pulling out connected appliances or opening pipework. [1]

Boundaries that prevent a wrong repair

  • Do not claim that a recirculating hood alone provides the kitchen extract described by Approved Document F. [2]
  • Do not remove a fan grille, alter a duct or fire damper, touch wiring or dismantle a water-using appliance. [2]
  • Do not attribute wet cabinet bases or floors to humidity until plumbing and appliance water routes have been assessed. [1]
  • Keep away and obtain urgent help where water reaches electrical equipment or active flow is damaging the property. [1]

Match the professional to the evidence

  • Use a ventilation professional to establish the discharge route and assess the kitchen's required extract provision. [2]
  • Use a competent plumber for a concealed, ongoing, pressurised or water-use-linked leak. [1]
  • Use an independent building professional if vapour, leakage and external fabric evidence remain mixed, and require a written cause and scope before any remedial decision. [1]

Property, sale and letting implications

  • Persistent moisture may swell cabinet materials, damage finishes, encourage mould and transfer vapour to colder rooms. [1]
  • For a future sale, retain extraction information, leak findings and completed-work records so the history is not limited to cosmetic repair.
  • An English tenant should report recurring condensation, mould, fan faults and suspected water leaks to the landlord or agent. [3]

Frequently asked questions

  • Why is there condensation when the hood is on? The hood may recirculate, or an extract system may be ineffective; sound is not an airflow test. [2]
  • Is water in a cupboard condensation? It may be, but plumbing, waste and appliance leaks should be excluded first. [1]
  • Should I order a larger fan? Not until the current system, discharge route, background air and possible leaks have been assessed. [2][1]

Review triggers

  • Review if H3 revises kitchen-extract, fan-observation or plumbing-leak rows.
  • Review after a change to Approved Document F or national damp guidance.

Evidence checkpoints

  • Approved Document F states that a recirculating cooker hood on its own is not compliant kitchen extract ventilation. [2]

    Evidence date:

  • Fan sound and visible movement can indicate operation but cannot establish the approved airflow rate. [2]

    Evidence date:

  • Cooking moisture, inadequate ventilation and water damage can coexist and require different remedies. [1]

    Evidence date:

Scope and safety review

This guidance applies to homes in England.

Jurisdiction
England
Who this covers
adult resident
Tenure
owner-occupied, private rented, social rented
Reviewed

Sources

  1. Understanding and addressing the health risks of damp and mould in the homeMinistry of Housing, Communities and Local Government; Department of Health and Social Care; UK Health Security Agency. Accessed .
  2. Ventilation: Approved Document FMinistry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Accessed .
  3. Private renting: RepairsGOV.UK. Accessed .